The next installment in the PBS/BBC Jane Austen series is set to air Sunday, January 20th, so I thought it was time to give my impressions of the book. I do not have high hopes for the dramatization, as, with most Austen fans, I found the last week's attempt to be mostly disappointing. Northanger Abbey, however, has been largely ignored by production companies eager to "reinterpret" Austen's work (there is only one film adaptation that I'm aware of), so at least it won't suffer too much by comparison. Saturday, January 19, 2008
NORTHANGER ABBEY--Jane Austen
The next installment in the PBS/BBC Jane Austen series is set to air Sunday, January 20th, so I thought it was time to give my impressions of the book. I do not have high hopes for the dramatization, as, with most Austen fans, I found the last week's attempt to be mostly disappointing. Northanger Abbey, however, has been largely ignored by production companies eager to "reinterpret" Austen's work (there is only one film adaptation that I'm aware of), so at least it won't suffer too much by comparison. Wednesday, January 16, 2008
AGNES GREY--Anne Bronte

Saturday, January 12, 2008
WELCOME TO THE WORLD, BABY GIRL--Fannie Flagg

Friday, January 11, 2008
PERSUASION--Jane Austen

Tuesday, January 8, 2008
QUEEN OF BABBLE--Meg Cabot

FAKING IT--Jennifer Crusie

Sunday, January 6, 2008
SAVANNAH BREEZE--Mary Kay Andrews

Picking out new books can be a crap shoot. You have high hopes, but often they let you down. I love finding new authors I enjoy, so I can be reasonably sure I'll like their other works.
That's how I felt when I read my first Mary Kay Andrews book several months ago, and my theory held true when I recently read "Savannah Breeze". Andrews' writing is a cut above the usual "chick-lit" fare, with more depth and substance to her writing, better developed characters, and more interesting plot lines. In this book, she employs the interesting device of having two of the characters alternately narrate different chapters, to shift the point of view slightly. The story involves a betrayal, a crime, and a crazy caper in an attempt to recover what was stolen and exact revenge. I love the novel's southern sensibility, the quirky characters, and especially the strong, loyal friendship at its core.
And the happy ending. I'm a sucker for those.
Saturday, January 5, 2008
THE NEXT BIG THING--Johanna Edwards

So today's book is representative of this vastly popular genre. And it's pretty good, incorporating another of America's mindless obsessions--reality TV. The main character, having met her British Mr. Right online, finds herself in need of rapid weight loss, as he's pressuring her for a face-to-face and she's not been entirely truthful about her plus-size figure. Enter the reality show, with the promise of a competitive weight-loss program and a nice cash prize with which to adorn the new body in style.
But "The Biggest Loser" this isn't. The competition is cut-throat, the producers manipulative, and contrivances tortuous. The drama, both onscreen and off, makes for compelling reading, and while the ending follows the predictable pattern there are still enough plot twists to keep you engaged. The protagonist is sympathetic, the characters are well fleshed out (no pun intended), and the pacing is brisk. If you're looking for a few hours of light entertainment, this isn't a bad choice.
Friday, January 4, 2008
DARCY'S STORY--Janet Aylmer

So I decided my first book had to pay tribute to my favorite authoress, with a review of a recent Jane Austen "sequel". You see, there is an entire literary sub-genre of JA fan fiction--sequels, prequels, retellings, modernizations, etc. Since poor Jane only managed to give us a few novels, her fans have always hungered for more. As you can imagine, some of these are better than others. And none of them truly live up to the originals. Still, after you've read "Pride and Prejudice" for the eighth or ninth time you want to find a way to spend a little more time with Lizzie and Darcy. It's fun to see her world through others' eyes, and read what they imagine might have happened after the curtain fell, or how the story might be seen from the perspective of a different protagonist.
That's the premise of Janet Aylmer's "Darcy's Story". Rather than relating the events through the eyes of Lizzie Bennet, JA's female protagonist, the author chooses to tell us the story as experienced by Darcy, the leading man. As Mr. D is the brooding, strong silent type, we were always left wondering just what was going through his mind at critical moments. Aylmer seeks to answer this question for us, while also filling us in on what he was doing during the lengthy passages in the original in which he does not appear.
I've read several of these novels, and I have to commend the author for her attempt to remain true to the original, unlike so many others. Unfortunately, this leads to her using much of Austen's material, including long passages of dialogue repeated verbatim. I found myself thinking I could just have read "Pride and Prejudice" and probably enjoyed it more. That said, I did enjoy the story. The character of Darcy was a bit more fleshed out, and the author's imaginings of what he might have been doing, thinking, and saying in those times in which he is not a part of the main action of the story are interesting and well thought out. Aylmer also does a very good job retaining the writing style and language of the early eighteenth century without sounding stilted or artificial. And I appreciated the fact that that, unlike many contemporary reworkings of Austen's work, no attempt was made to made to "spice up" the work for a modern audience.
Not Jane Austen, but not bad. And believe me, I've read enough bad to recognize it.
Thursday, January 3, 2008
About me
I have, however, been wanting for some time to begin keeping a log or journal of what I've read. I read a lot. Too much, really. And after awhile, it all kind of runs together. I'd like to have a list of books I've read, and some notes about what I thought of them, in case I want to go back and re-read something I enjoyed, or check out an author's other works. And this, I thought, might be interesting.
You see, I read almost anything. Just like with my diet, I try to consume what is most nourishing. But more often, I wind up snacking on junk. So while I sometimes like to sink my teeth into great literature, or feed my brain with interesting non-fiction, much of my consumption is the literary equivalent of potato chips. My eclectic reading list, I thought, might be the fodder for some potentially lively discussion.
Feel free to add your own opinions. Argue, agree, laugh with me or at me. Recommend your own favorites. I'd love to hear from you!
